%0 Journal Article
%T Rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison between small ruptured intracranial aneurysms and large unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
%A Peng MJ
%A Zeng L
%A Liu LL
%A Wen L
%A Wang GX
%J Medicine (Baltimore)
%V 103
%N 28
%D 2024 Jul 12
%M 38996146
%F 1.817
%R 10.1097/MD.0000000000038909
%X To compare the differences in clinical and morphological features between small ruptured intracranial aneurysms and large unruptured intracranial aneurysms to evaluate the risk factors for the rupture of IAs. The clinical data of 189 consecutive patients with 193 IAs were reviewed. The patients and IAs were divided into ruptured (<5 mm) and unruptured groups (>10 mm). The characteristics of the patients and the intracranial aneurysms (IAs) were compared between the 2 groups, and the risk factors for rupture of IAs were assessed using multiple logistic regression. Patient age (odds ratio [OR], 0.955), IA located at the internal carotid artery (ICA, OR, 0.202), irregular shape (OR, 0.083) and parent vessel diameter (OR, 0.426) were negatively correlated with the risk of IA rupture. IAs located at bifurcations (OR, 6.766) were positively correlated with the risk of IA rupture. In addition to the size of the IAs, regardless of IAs shape, other factors, such as younger age (<63.5 years), location at a bifurcation, IAs located at the ICA and a small parent vessel diameter (<3.25 mm), can influence the risk of IA rupture.