%0 Case Reports
%T Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) and Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter: Should a Computed Tomography (CT) Venogram and Inferior Vena Cavagram Be the Standard of Care?
%A Huynh K
%A Sanchala A
%A Ekiz A
%J Cureus
%V 16
%N 4
%D 2024 Apr
%M 38957832
暂无%R 10.7759/cureus.58529
%X A pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Although timely anticoagulation is the first-line treatment for DVT, an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can be considered when anticoagulation is contraindicated. Unfortunately, IVC filters come with complications of their own, including thrombus formation in or around the filter. An 89-year-old man with a past medical history of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and prior DVT status post IVC filter implantation five years ago in 2018 presented with hypotension, dizziness, and syncope. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest showed bilateral PEs. Venous Doppler ultrasound of the bilateral lower extremities was negative for DVT. CT venogram was performed; however, the contrast filling was suboptimal and as such, a venous thrombosis could not be ruled out. Therefore, an inferior vena cavagram was performed through the right common femoral vein and confirmed a large thrombus positioned cephalad to the IVC filter. A thrombectomy was performed and the IVC filter was replaced given the patient was at high risk for venous thromboembolism recurrence and complications.  Although an IVC filter offers some protection from recurrent PEs, it does have risks and complications. As seen in our patient, the IVC filter can be a nidus for the formation of a thrombus which has the risk of dislodging. When evaluating a patient for the source of a PE, it is important to consider prior IVC implant and perform further workups, such as a CT venogram or an inferior vena cavagram, to evaluate for thrombus in or around the filter.