%0 Journal Article
%T Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Practice: Practical Guidance for Institutional Review Boards.
%A Bachmann JM
%A Shiflet MA
%A Palacios JR
%A Turer RW
%A Wallace GH
%A Rosenbloom ST
%A Rice TW
%J Ethics Hum Res
%V 46
%N 4
%D 2024 Jul-Aug
%M 38944884
暂无%R 10.1002/eahr.500216
%X The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is increasingly common in routine clinical practice. As tools to quantify symptoms and health status, PROMs play an important role in focusing health care on outcomes that matter to patients. The uses of PROM data are myriad, ranging from clinical care to survey-based research and quality improvement. Discerning the boundaries between these use cases can be challenging for institutional review boards (IRBs). In this article, we provide a framework for classifying the three primary PROM use cases (clinical care, human subjects research, and quality improvement) and discuss the level of IRB oversight (if any) necessary for each. One of the most important considerations for IRB staff is whether PROMs are being used primarily for clinical care and thus do not constitute human subjects research. We discuss characteristics of PROMs implemented primarily for clinical care, focusing on: data platform; survey location; questionnaire length; patient interface; and clinician interface. We also discuss IRB oversight of projects involving the secondary use of PROM data that were collected during the course of clinical care, which span human subjects research and quality improvement. This framework provides practical guidance for IRB staff as well as clinicians who use PROMs as communication aids in routine clinical practice.