%0 Journal Article
%T Evaluation of clinical impact of two types of Temporomandibular joint disc reduction and fixation.
%A Liu Z
%A Yin J
%A Cao W
%A Deng L
%A Song Z
%A Zhang Y
%A Hao J
%A Zhang Q
%J J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jun 26
%M 38942235
%F 2.48
%R 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101956
%X OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and stability of open suture versus micro-screw anchored disc reduction and fixation in treating disc displacement without reduction in the anterior temporomandibular joint.
METHODS: A total of 38 patients (51 sides) with anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwR) of the TMJ treated in our hospital from August 2021 to January 2023 were selected, including 19 cases in group A (23 sides) treated with open temporomandibular joint disc reduction and anchorage, and 19 cases in group B (28 sides) treated with temporomandibular joint disc reduction and suture. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data of the two groups before and after operation were compared to evaluate the effective rate of articular disc reduction, the change of articular disc length, The Maximal Interincisal Opening (MIO) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were measured before and after operation.
RESULTS: In group A, the MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction was 95.65 % (22/23), the disc length gain was 1.74 mm, MIO was 40.32±5.067 mm, and NRS was 0.47±0.697. The MRI effective rate 6 months after disc reduction in group B was 100 % (28/28). The disc length gain was 1.78 mm, MIO was 41.58±3.746 mm, and NRS was 0.00. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: TMJ disc reduction and suture and open TMJ disc anchorage can effectively reduce the TMJ disc. The TMJ disc stability is high at 6 months after operation, and the pain and mouth opening can be improved, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.