%0 Journal Article
%T The role of input vs. output phonological working memory in narrative production: Evidence from case series and case study approaches.
%A Zahn R
%A Martin RC
%J Cogn Neuropsychol
%V 41
%N 1
%D 2024 Feb-Mar 27
%M 38935595
%F 3.75
%R 10.1080/02643294.2024.2366467
%X Separable input and output phonological working memory (WM) capacities have been proposed, with the input capacity supporting speech recognition and the output capacity supporting production. We examined the role of input vs. output phonological WM in narrative production, examining speech rate and pronoun ratio - two measures with prior evidence of a relation to phonological WM. For speech rate, a case series approach with individuals with aphasia found no significant independent contribution of input or output phonological WM capacity after controlling for single-word production. For pronoun ratio, there was some suggestion of a role for input phonological WM. Thus, neither finding supported a specific role for an output phonological buffer in speech production. In contrast, two cases demonstrating dissociations between input and output phonological WM capacities provided suggestive evidence of predicted differences in narrative production, though follow-up research is needed. Implications for case series vs. case study approaches are discussed.