%0 Journal Article
%T Isocaloric replacement of ultraprocessed foods was associated with greater weight loss in the POUNDS Lost trial.
%A Yao Q
%A de Araujo CD
%A Juul F
%A Champagne CM
%A Bray GA
%A Sacks FM
%A Vadiveloo MK
%J Obesity (Silver Spring)
%V 32
%N 7
%D 2024 07
%M 38932724
%F 9.298
%R 10.1002/oby.24044
%X Higher intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) is associated with obesity. We examined whether replacing UPFs (NOVA 4) with minimally processed foods and culinary ingredients (NOVA 1 + 2) was associated with differential weight change in this secondary prospective analysis of the Preventing Overweight Using Novel Dietary Strategies (POUNDS) Lost trial.<BR>We estimated percent energy intake (%kcal) from the four NOVA groups using 24-h dietary recalls in a subset of 356 participants. Multivariable-adjusted substitution models examined whether replacing %kcal from UPFs with NOVA 1 + 2 was associated with greater weight, body fat percentage, trunk fat, and waist circumference reduction at 6 months; changes in parameters were compared among NOVA 1 + 2 tertiles (T).<BR>Participants were on average 52.3 years of age, 85% White, 55% female, and 58.2% nonsmoking, with a mean BMI of 32.7 kg/m2. Replacing 10%kcal of UPFs with NOVA 1 + 2 was associated with greater 6-month weight (ß = 0.51, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.09, p = 0.02), body fat percentage (ß = 2.7, 95% CI: -5.10 to -0.43, p = 0.02), and trunk fat reduction (ß = 3.9, 95% CI: -7.01 to -0.70, p = 0.02), but not waist circumference reduction. Participants in T3 (-8.33 kg) versus T1 (-5.32 kg) of NOVA 1 + 2 had greater weight loss (p < 0.001).<BR>Isocaloric substitution of UPFs with NOVA 1 + 2 was associated with marginally greater weight loss under energy restriction. These modest findings support more research exploring the mechanisms linking UPFs with body weight regulation beyond energy intake.