%0 Journal Article
%T Alternative Access for TAVR: Choosing the Right Pathway.
%A Lutz K
%A Asturias KM
%A Garg J
%A Poudyal A
%A Lantz G
%A Golwala H
%A Doberne J
%A Politano A
%A Song HK
%A Zahr F
%J J Clin Med
%V 13
%N 12
%D 2024 Jun 9
%M 38929915
%F 4.964
%R 10.3390/jcm13123386
%X Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an alternative treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis regardless of surgical risk, particularly in those with a high and prohibitive risk. Since the advent of TAVR, transfemoral access has been the standard of care. However, given comorbidities and anatomical limitations, a proportion of patients are not good candidates for a transfemoral approach. Alternative access, including transapical, transaortic, transaxillary, transsubclavian, transcarotid, and transcaval, can be considered. Each alternative access has advantages and disadvantages, so the vascular route should be tailored to the patient's characteristics. However, there is no standardized algorithm when choosing the optimal alternative vascular access. In this review, we analyzed the evolution and current evidence for the most common alternative access for TAVR and proposed an algorithm for choosing the optimal vascular access in this patient population.