%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of remineralization ability of tricalcium silicate and of glass ionomer cement on residual dentin: an in vitro study.
%A Kuru E
%A Eronat N
%A Türkün M
%A Çoğulu D
%J BMC Oral Health
%V 24
%N 1
%D 2024 Jun 26
%M 38926776
%F 3.747
%R 10.1186/s12903-024-04475-4
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>This study aimed to compare the remineralization effects of a calcium silicate-based cement (Biodentine) and of a glass ionomer cement (GIC: Fuji IX) on artificially demineralized dentin.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Four standard cavities were prepared in dentin discs prepared from 34 extracted sound human third molars. In each disc, one cavity was covered with an acid-resistant varnish before demineralization (Group 1). The specimens were soaked in a chemical demineralization solution for 96 h to induce artificial carious lesions. Thereafter, one cavity each was filled with Biodentine (Group 2) and GIC (Group 3), respectively, and one carious lesion was left unrestored as a negative control (Group 4). Next, specimens were immersed in simulated body fluid (SBF) for 21 days. After cross-sectioning the specimens, the Ca/P ratio was calculated in each specimen by using scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX). Finally, data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni correction.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Both cement types induced dentin remineralization as compared to Group 4. The Ca/P ratio was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 3 (p < 0.05).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The dentin lesion remineralization capability of Biodentine is higher than that of GIC, suggesting the usefulness of the former as a bioactive dentin replacement material.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Biodentine has a higher remineralization ability than that of GIC for carious dentin, and its interfacial properties make it a promising bioactive dentin restorative material.