%0 Journal Article
%T Uptake rate of interventions among women who screened positive for perinatal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
%A Han J
%A Cong S
%A Sun X
%A Xie H
%A Ni S
%A Zhang A
%J J Affect Disord
%V 361
%N 0
%D 2024 Sep 15
%M 38925310
%F 6.533
%R 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.072
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Perinatal depression is a global public health problem that seriously affects the health of perinatal women. This study evaluated the pooled uptake rate of interventions among women who screened positive for perinatal depression to provide a basis for clinical intervention.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We systematically searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) from the establishment of the database to May 1, 2023. All included studies were used to derive the pooled uptake rate. We also performed meta-regression and subgroup analysis to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity using STATA 17.0.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Of 15024 retrieved articles, only 41 met the inclusion criteria. The overall uptake rate was 55 % (95 % CI 43-67 %). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses both showed that the uptake rate in high-income countries 57 % (95 % CI 50-65 %) was higher than that in low and middle-income countries 37 % (95 % CI 18-56 %).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>First, only English publications were included. Therefore, articles in other languages were likely missed. Second, of the 41 studies included, there were only six randomized controlled trials, with limited quality of evidence. Third, we could not adequately explain the source of heterogeneity because there were too many mediating variables, although further subgroup and sensitivity analysis were performed.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>About a half of women did not receive interventions after screening positive, and the uptake rate of interventions in high-income countries was higher than that in low and middle-income countries.