%0 Journal Article
%T Predicting brain edema and outcomes after thrombectomy in stroke: Frontal delta/alpha ratio as an optimal quantitative EEG index.
%A Shen Y
%A You H
%A Yang Y
%A Tang R
%A Ji Z
%A Liu H
%A Du M
%A Zhou M
%J Clin Neurophysiol
%V 164
%N 0
%D 2024 Aug 27
%M 38896932
%F 4.861
%R 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.05.009
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>We aimed to determine whether quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) measures have predictive value for cerebral edema (CED) and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A total of 105 patients with AIS in the anterior circulation were enrolled in this prospective study. The occurrence and severity of CED were assessed through computed tomography conducted 24 h after MT. Clinical outcomes were evaluated based on early neurological deterioration (END) and 3-month functional status, as measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings were performed 24 h after MT, and QEEG indices were calculated from the standard 16 electrodes and 2 frontal channels (F3-C3, F4-C4). The delta/alpha ratio (DAR), the (delta + theta) / (alpha + beta) ratio (DTABR), and relative delta power were averaged over all electrodes (global) and the F3-C3 and F4-C4 channels (frontal). The predictive effect and value of QEEG indices for CED and clinical outcomes were assessed using ordinal and logistic regression models, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Significantly, both global and frontal DAR were found to be associated with the severity of CED, END, and poor functional outcomes at 90 days, while global and frontal DTABR and relative delta power were not associated with outcomes. In ROC analysis, the best predictive effect was observed in frontal DAR, with an area under the curve of approximately 0.80. It exhibited approximately 75% sensitivity and 71% specificity for radiological and clinical outcomes when a threshold of 3.3 was used.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>QEEG techniques may be considered an efficient bedside monitoring method for assessing treatment efficacy, identifying patients at higher risk of severe CED and END, and predicting long-term functional outcomes.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>QEEG can help identify patients at risk of severe neurological complications that can impact long-term functional recovery in AIS patients who underwent MT.