%0 Journal Article
%T Digital workflow feasibility for the fabrication of intraoral maxillofacial prosthetics after surgical resection: a systematic literature review.
%A Srivastava G
%A Padhiary SK
%A Mohanty N
%A Patil PG
%A Panda S
%A Cobo-Vazquez C
%A Çakmak G
%A Molinero-Mourelle P
%J Acta Odontol Scand
%V 83
%N 0
%D 2024 Jun 19
%M 38895776
%F 2.232
%R 10.2340/aos.v83.40870
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To evaluate the current evidence of digital workflow feasibility based on the data acquisition methods and the software tools used to fabricate intraoral prostheses for patients with partial or total maxillary and mandibular defects.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>An electronic search was performed in PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science using a combination of relevant keywords: digital workflow, digital designing, computer-assisted design-computer aided manufacturing, 3D printing, maxillectomy, and mandibulectomy. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of evidence in the studies reviewed.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>From a total of 542 references, 33 articles were selected, including 25 on maxillary prostheses and 8 on mandibular prostheses. The use of digital workflows was limited to one or two steps of the fabrication of the prostheses, and only four studies described a complete digital workflow. The most preferred method for data acquisition was intraoral scanning with or without a cone beam computed tomography combination.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Currently, the fabrication process of maxillofacial prostheses requires combining digital and conventional methods. Simplifying the data acquisition methods and providing user-friendly and affordable software may encourage clinicians to use the digital workflow more frequently for patients requiring maxillofacial prostheses.