%0 Journal Article
%T Clinical trial recruitment of people who speak languages other than English: a Children's Oncology Group report.
%A Beauchemin MP
%A Ortega M
%A Santacroce SJ
%A Robles JM
%A Ruiz J
%A Hall AG
%A Kahn JM
%A Fu C
%A Orjuela-Grimm M
%A Hillyer GC
%A Solomon S
%A Pelletier W
%A Montiel-Esparza R
%A Blazin LJ
%A Kline C
%A Seif AE
%A Aristizabal P
%A Winestone LE
%A Velez MC
%J JNCI Cancer Spectr
%V 8
%N 4
%D 2024 Jul 1
%M 38889291
暂无%R 10.1093/jncics/pkae047
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Persons who speak languages other than English are underrepresented in clinical trials, likely in part because of inadequate multilevel resources. We conducted a survey of institutions affiliated with the Children's Oncology Group (COG) to characterize current research recruitment practices and resources regarding translation and interpretation services.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>In October 2022, a 20-item survey was distributed electronically to institutions affiliated with COG to assess consent practices and resources for recruiting participants who speak languages other than English to COG trials. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses; responses were compared by institution size and type as well as respondent role.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The survey was sent to 230 institutions, and the response rate was 60% (n = 139). In total, 60% (n = 83) of those respondents had access to short-form consent forms. Full consent form translation was required at 50% of institutions, and 12% of institutional review boards restricted use of centrally translated consent forms. Forty-six percent (n = 64) of institutions reported insufficient funding to support translation costs; 19% (n = 26) had access to no-cost translation services. Forty-four percent (n = 61) were required to use in-person interpreters for consent discussions; the most frequently cited barrier (56%) to obtaining consent was lack of available in-person interpreters. Forty-seven percent (n = 65) reported that recruiting persons who speak languages other than English to clinical trials was somewhat or very difficult.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Institutions affiliated with COG face resource-specific challenges that impede recruitment of participants who speak languages other than English for clinical trials. These findings indicate an urgent need to identify strategies aimed at reducing recruitment barriers to ensure equitable access to clinical trials.