%0 Journal Article
%T Dosimetric and NTCP advantages of robust proton therapy over robust VMAT for Stage III NSCLC in the immunotherapy era.
%A Dionisi F
%A Landoni V
%A Widesott L
%A Nardangeli A
%A Fracchiolla F
%A Siniscalchi B
%A Soriani A
%A Turkaj A
%A Righetto R
%A Amelio D
%A Farace P
%A Goanta L
%A Trianni A
%A Lorentini S
%A Cianchetti M
%A Sanguineti G
%J Phys Med
%V 123
%N 0
%D 2024 Jul 14
%M 38878630
%F 3.119
%R 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103410
%X OBJECTIVE: To assess the robustness and to define the dosimetric and NTCP advantages of pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) compared with VMAT for unresectable Stage III non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) in the immunotherapy era.
METHODS: 10 patients were re-planned with VMAT and PBSPT using: 1) ITV-based robust optimization with 0.5 cm setup uncertainties and (for PBSPT) 3.5 % range uncertainties on free-breathing CT 2) CTV-based RO including all 4DCTs anatomies. Target coverage (TC), organs at risk dose and TC robustness (TCR), set at V95%, were compared. The NTCP risk for radiation pneumonitis (RP), 24-month mortality (24MM), G2 + acute esophageal toxicity (ET), the dose to the immune system (EDIC) and the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery V15 < 10 % were registered. Wilcoxon test was used.
RESULTS: Both PBSPT methods improved TC and TCR (p < 0.01). The mean lung dose and lung V20 were lower with PBSPT (p < 0.01). Median mean heart dose reduction with PBSPT was 8 Gy (p < 0.001). PT lowered median LAD V15 (p = 0.004). ΔNTCP > 5 % with PBSPT was observed for two patients for RP and for five patients for 24 MM. ΔNTCP for ≥ G2 ET was not in favor of PBSPT for all patients. PBSPT halved median EDIC (4.9/5.1 Gy for ITV/CTV-based VMAT vs 2.3 Gy for both ITV/CTV-based PBSPT, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: PBSPT is a robust approach with significant dosimetric and NTCP advantages over VMAT; the EDIC reduction could allow for a better integration with immunotherapy. A clinical benefit for a subset of NSCLC patients is expected.