%0 Journal Article
%T Imaging Modalities for Identifying Causes of Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
%A Zagzoog FH
%A Almousa H
%A Almeshari S
%A Aldhowaihy F
%A Almohizea MI
%A Bukhari M
%J J Voice
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jun 13
%M 38876889
%F 2.3
%R 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.04.029
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Vocal fold paralysis (VFP), involving one or both vocal folds, often indicates underlying pathologies. Identifying VFP causes is vital for excluding malignancies and focusing on treating the cause. While various imaging methods are used to investigate VFP causes, their detection abilities remain unclear. This study aims to assess the detection prevalence of different imaging techniques in determining the causes of VFP.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>In September 2023 a comprehensive search was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across multiple databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and EMBASE. Following the search, the retrieved studies were screened based on the predefined eligibility criteria. Data extraction from the included studies was carried out independently by two authors. Outcomes were analyzed using pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Our meta-analysis encompassed 14 studies with 1492 VFP patients included. Malignant causes for VFP identification were most prevalent in F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/Computed Tomography (CT) (41.5%) followed by Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (40%), with CT being the lowest (17.1%). Conversely, benign causes had the highest prevalence in F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (10.8%), followed by MRI (6.7%) and CT (4%). In the VFP cause identification, MRI had the highest detection prevalence (58.1%), followed by CT (30.1%), and Ultra Sound (US) had the lowest (26.8%). In chest lesion detection, CT had the highest prevalence (17.6%), followed by Chest X-ray (CXR) (6.5%). Head lesions were detected with CT at a prevalence of 15%, while neck lesion detection showed CT prevalence at 38.9% and US at 20.6%.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Our study revealed varying prevalence rates for the identification of malignant and benign causes across different imaging modalities. MRI demonstrated the highest overall detection prevalence for VFP causes, while CT was most commonly used and had the highest prevalence for specific lesions detection in various regions. These findings provide valuable insights into the diagnostic utility of different imaging techniques in the evaluation of VFP.