%0 Journal Article
%T Distal femur fractures in elderly treated with internal fixation or distal femoral replacement - retrospective cohort study on 75 patients assessing functional outcomes, reoperations, and mortality.
%A Garabano G
%A Pereira S
%A Juri A
%A Bidolegui F
%A Pesciallo CA
%J Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Jun 13
%M 38869628
暂无%R 10.1007/s00590-024-04027-0
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>This cohort study aimed to describe the functional outcomes, complications, and mortality of patients over 65 with acute distal femur fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or distal femoral replacement (DFR).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We retrospectively analyzed all patients older than 65, operated consecutively for a distal femur fracture treated with ORIF or DFR. We included 75 patients (9 33A, 5 33B, and 61 33C AO/OTA fractures), 55 treated with ORIF, and 20 with DFR. We used Parker's mobility index (PMI) to assess functional outcomes at 1, 3, and 12 months and study closure. We analyzed complications, reoperations, and mortality at 30 days, one year, and at the end of the study.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The PMI was significantly higher in the DFR group at months 1 (p = 0.023) and 3 (p = 0.032). We found no significant differences between cohorts at one year and the end of follow-up. Postoperative complications were significantly more frequent in the ORIF group (38.10% vs. 10%, p = 0.022). Reoperations were similar in both cohorts (p = 0.98). Mortality at one month was 4% and 20% at one year, and at the end of follow-up, there were no significant differences between groups.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The outcomes of this study suggest that DFR offers a faster functional recovery with lower complication rates than those treated with ORIF. Additionally, both options have similar reoperation and mortality rates. Appropriately designed studies are needed to define the best treatment strategy for this type of patient.