%0 Journal Article
%T The Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans in Determining the Working Length in Teeth Requiring Non-surgical Endodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Clinical Study.
%A Abulhamael AM
%A Barayan M
%A Makki LM
%A Alsharyoufi SM
%A Albalawi TH
%A Zahran S
%A Alkhattab O
%A Kutbi AS
%A Alrehili RS
%A Alzamzami ZT
%J Cureus
%V 16
%N 5
%D 2024 May
%M 38854298
暂无%R 10.7759/cureus.59907
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Endodontic treatment aims to eradicate both microbial infection and inflammatory processes within the root canal space as well as in the periapical (PA) region of the tooth. To achieve this, the canals should be cleaned, shaped, disinfected, and obturated to the proper working length. Clinically, the working length is described as the measurement from the coronal reference point to the physiological apex located at the apical foramen. In the available literature, electronic apex locators (EAL) with periapical (PA) radiographs are the most reliable and precise tools for determining the working length in routine root canal treatment. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective clinical study is to evaluate if cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans are reliable and accurate in measuring endodontic working length compared to standard clinical measurement methods.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Patients who fit the inclusion criteria were identified. A postgraduate endodontic resident blinded to the cone beam computed tomography scan results treated all teeth in the field of view that needed endodontic treatment. The root canal length was determined using J Morita Root ZX II apex locator (J Morita Corp., Kyoto, Japan) and periapical radiographs. The dental radiology specialist interpreted the pre-existing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan images and determined the working length. Statistical comparisons of the working length measurements of EAL and CBCT were performed using paired sample t-tests after verifying normality.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>No statistically significant differences in the working lengths were found in all canals with the exception of the palatal canal only (t=2.16, p=0.034), suggesting consistent measurements between EAL and CBCT.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>In teeth requiring endodontic treatment, pre-existing cone beam computed tomography scan images are accurate as electronic apex locators when determining the working length. A limitation of this study is that it only includes a limited number of samples and is affected by operator variation.