%0 Journal Article
%T Palliative single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy for children with spastic cerebral palsy Gross Motor Function Classification System level IV and V: a case series and systematic review of the literature.
%A Licci M
%A Frank NA
%A Greuter L
%A Rasadurai A
%A Fernandes Arroteia I
%A Juenemann S
%A Guzman R
%A Soleman J
%J Neurosurg Focus
%V 56
%N 6
%D 2024 06
%M 38823044
%F 4.332
%R 10.3171/2024.3.FOCUS2478
%X Single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR), typically indicated for ambulatory patients, is a controversial topic for severe spastic cerebral palsy (CP) with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level IV or V. The objective of this case series and systematic literature review was to outline the indication and outcome of palliative SDR for nonambulatory patients with CP and GMFCS level IV and V, focusing on improvement of spasticity and of patient and caregiver reported quality of life assessment.<BR>A retrospective case series of patients with CP and GMFCS level IV or V who underwent single-level SDR at the authors' institution is presented. Furthermore, two databases (PubMed and Embase) were searched and a systematic review with a search string based on the terms "selective dorsal rhizotomy," "cerebral palsy," and "outcome" was conducted. The primary outcome was the reduction of spasticity based on the modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Secondary outcomes were change on the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66), evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), surgical morbidity, and mortality.<BR>Eleven consecutive children under the age of 25 years undergoing palliative single-level SDR were included. All patients showed a reduction in MAS score (mean 1.09 ± 0.66 points) and no surgical morbidity and mortality occurred. For the systematic review results from our case series, in addition to 4 reports, 274 total patients were included. Reduction of spasticity based on MAS score was noted in all studies (mean range 1.09-3.2 points). Furthermore, in 2 studies spasticity of the upper extremities showed a MAS score reduction as well (range 1.7-2.8 points). The GMFM-66 score improved in 72% of the patients, while bladder function improved in 78% of the patients. Based on the PROMs, 92% of the patients/caregivers were satisfied with the outcome and their quality of life after the procedure. Two wound infections (2.7%) and one CSF leak (1.3%) occurred, while no surgery-related deaths were described.<BR>This analysis showed an improvement in spasticity, daily care, and comfort for patients with CP and GMFCS levels IV and V. Larger cohorts analyzing the outcome of palliative single-level SDR, based on the MAS, GMFM-66, and PROMs, are still needed and should be the focus of future studies. Systematic review registration no.: CRD42024495762 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/).