%0 Journal Article
%T Morphological evaluation of the nasopalatine canal using cone beam computed tomography and its clinical implications for orthodontic miniscrew insertion.
%A Gibas-Stanek M
%A Kościółek-Rudy D
%A Szumilas K
%A Wojas-Hille K
%A Pihut M
%J Dent Med Probl
%V 61
%N 3
%D 2024 May-Jun 29
%M 38808382
暂无%R 10.17219/dmp/159154
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>The morphology of the nasopalatine canal is crucial in the planning of prosthetic restorations in the anterior region of the maxilla, as well as in the placement of orthodontic mini-implants.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The aim of this study was to assess the morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of patients from the University Dental Clinic in Krakow, Poland, to define the position of the canal in relation to common sites of palatal median microimplant placement, and to investigate potential correlations between the anatomy of the canal and age and gender of the patients.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A total of 120 CBCT images were used to assess the anatomy of the nasopalatine canal in 3 planes of space. The bone thickness anterior to the nasopalatine canal and the distance between the distal margin of Stenson's foramen and the predicted midpalatal microimplant position were also measured.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The most frequently observed canal type in the coronal plane was the Y-shaped canal, which was present in 60.8% of patients. The nasopalatine canal was classified as cone-shaped in 31.7% of the scans, cylindrical in 28.3%, hourglass-shaped in 27.5%, and banana-shaped in 12.5%. The mean length of the nasopalatine canal was 11.58 mm. The mean width of the canal was 2.89 mm at the nasal fossa level, 1.94 mm in the middle, and 5.09 mm at the palatal level. The mean bone thickness anterior to the nasopalatine canal was 9.07 mm at the level of the nasal opening, 6.84 mm at the level of the oral opening, and 7.32 mm in the middle. The mean distance between the distal margin of Stenson's foramen and the predicted midpalatal microimplant position varied from 0 to 11.94 mm, with a mean of 2.49 mm.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Given the variety of nasopalatine canal forms and dimensions, detailed analysis of CBCT scans is essential prior to the placement of implants and microimplants.