%0 Journal Article
%T Treating epidermolytic ichthyosis and ichthyosis with confetti with epidermal autografts cultured from revertant skin.
%A Tanahashi K
%A Kono M
%A Yoshikawa T
%A Suzuki Y
%A Inoie M
%A Kuwatsuka Y
%A Kinoshita F
%A Takeichi T
%A Akiyama M
%J Br J Dermatol
%V 191
%N 3
%D 2024 Aug 14
%M 38739763
%F 11.113
%R 10.1093/bjd/ljae193
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>No efficient treatment has yet been established for epidermolytic ichthyosis (EI), which is caused by pathogenic variants of KRT1 or KRT10. Patients with ichthyosis with confetti (IWC) have multiple normal-appearing spots, caused by the revertant somatic recombination of pathogenic variants that occurs at each spot independently. Additionally, some patients with EI have large areas of normal skin due to revertant postzygotic mosaicism.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To assess the feasibility of transplanting cultured epidermal autografts (CEAs) produced from revertant epidermal keratinocytes in patients with EI and IWC.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We performed a clinical trial of treatment with CEAs produced from each patient's own revertant epidermal keratinocytes as a proof-of-concept study. This was a single-arm, open, unmasked, uncontrolled, single-assignment, treatment-purpose study. The primary outcome was the percentage area that lacked recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 4 weeks after the final transplant. The secondary outcome was the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions 24 weeks after the initial transplantation. The trial was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTb041190097).<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>We successfully produced CEAs from genetically confirmed revertant skin from two patients with mosaic EI and from one patient with IWC and confirmed by amplicon sequencing and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction analysis that the CEAs mainly consisted of revertant wild-type cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis confirmed the normal proliferation and safety profiling of CEAs. CEAs were transplanted onto desquamated lesional sites in the patients. Four weeks post-transplantation, the percentage area lacking recurrence of ichthyosis lesions in the three patients was 40%, 100% and 100% respectively, although recurrence of ichthyosis lesions was seen at the site of CEA transplantation in all three patients at 24 weeks post-transplantation.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>CEAs from normal skin have the potential to be a safe and local treatment option for EI and IWC.<BR>Epidermolytic ichthyosis is a rare skin condition that causes redness, blistering and thickening of the skin. There is currently no effective treatment for the disease, which is caused by mutations in the genes KRT1 or KRT10. People with a type of the disease called ‘ichthyosis with confetti’ have many normal-appearing spots that are caused by the natural repair of the gene mutations. Some people with epidermolytic ichthyosis have large areas of healthy skin as a result of genetic mutations having been corrected. In this study, we successfully produced skin grafts from the healthy skin of two patients with epidermolytic ichthyosis and one with ‘ichthyosis with confetti’. We confirmed that the skin grafts mainly consisted of repaired skin cells. A technique called ‘single-cell RNA sequencing’ confirmed the skin cells in the skin grafts behaved like healthy skin cells and that the grafts were safe. Overall, our study findings suggest that skin grafts taken from skin consisting of genetically normal keratinocytes that have undergone self-repair have potential to be a safe treatment option for patients with severe epidermolytic ichthyosis and ‘ichthyosis with confetti’.