%0 Journal Article
%T Bleeding risk in hemophilia A and B carriers: comparison of factor levels determined using chronometric and chromogenic assays.
%A Chiffré-Rakotoarivony D
%A Diaz-Cau I
%A Ranc A
%A Champiat MA
%A Rousseau F
%A Gournay-Garcia C
%A Théron A
%A Navarro R
%A Boulot P
%A Aguilar-Martinez P
%A Sauguet P
%A Biron-Andréani C
%J Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis
%V 35
%N 5
%D 2024 Jul 1
%M 38700721
%F 1.061
%R 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001305
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Predicting the bleeding risk in hemophilia A and B carriers (HAC, HBC) is challenging.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The objectives of this study were to describe the bleeding phenotype in HAC and HBC using the standardized Tosetto bleeding score (BS); to determine whether the BS correlates better with factor levels measured with a chromogenic assay than with factor levels measured with chronometric and thrombin generation assays; and to compare the results in HAC and HBC.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This ambispective, noninterventional study included obligate and sporadic HAC and HBC followed at a hemophilia treatment center between 1995 and 2019.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The median BS (3, range 0-21 vs. 3.5, range 0-15, P  = ns, respectively) and the abnormal BS rate (35.6% vs. 38.2%, P  = ns) were not significantly different in 104 HAC and 34 HBC (mean age: 38 years, 6-80 years). However, some differences were identified. The risk of factor deficiency was higher in HBC than HAC. Specifically, Factor VIII activity (FVIII):C/Factor IX activity (FIX):C level was low (<40 IU/dl) in 18.3% (chronometric assay) and 17.5% (chromogenic assay) of HAC and in 47% and 72.2% of HBC ( P  < 0.001). Moreover, the FIX:C level thresholds of 39.5 IU/dl (chronometric assay) and of 33.5 IU/dl (chromogenic assay) were associated with very good sensitivity (92% and 100%, respectively) and specificity (80% for both) for bleeding risk prediction in HBC. Conversely, no FVIII:C level threshold could be identified for HAC, probably due to FVIII:C level variations throughout life.