%0 Journal Article
%T Long-term effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation: 4-year data from the ETNA-AF-Europe study.
%A Kirchhof P
%A Bakhai A
%A de Asmundis C
%A de Groot JR
%A Deharo JC
%A Kelly P
%A Lopez-de-Sa E
%A Monteiro P
%A Fronk EM
%A Lamparter M
%A Laeis P
%A Smolnik R
%A Steffel J
%A Waltenberger J
%A Weiss TW
%A De Caterina R
%A  
%J Int J Cardiol
%V 408
%N 0
%D 2024 Aug 1
%M 38697397
%F 4.039
%R 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132118
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>To assess long-term effectiveness and safety of edoxaban in Europe.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>ETNA-AF-Europe, a prospective, multinational, multi-centre, post-authorisation, observational study was conducted in agreement with the European Medicines Agency. The primary and secondary objectives assessed real-world safety (including bleeding and deaths) and effectiveness (including stroke, systemic embolic events and clinical edoxaban use), respectively. Median (interquartile range) age of the 13,164 patients was 75.0 (68.0-80.0) years; CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.0 (2.0-4.0) and 2.0 (1.0-2.0), respectively. Follow-up duration was 3.98 (3.21-4.05) years. Patients on edoxaban 30 mg (n = 3042) at baseline were older (80.0 vs 73.0 years), more likely assessed as frail by investigators (27.0% vs 6.6%) and had more comorbidities than those on edoxaban 60 mg (n = 9617; missing dosing information for n = 505). Annualised event rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death in the overall population, edoxaban 60 mg and edoxaban 30 mg groups were 4.1%, 2.8% and 8.4%, and 1.0%, 0.7% and 2.0%, respectively. Annualised rates of stroke were relatively constant throughout the follow-up, transient ischaemic attack and systemic embolism were < 1% in the overall population. Rates of any major and major gastrointestinal bleeding were low, with slightly higher rates for edoxaban 30 vs 60 mg group. Intracranial haemorrhage was uncommon (0.2%).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>In European patients with AF, long-term therapy with edoxaban is associated with low and relatively constant annualised rates of stroke and major bleeding. Differences in outcomes between the two approved doses are attributable to differences in clinical characteristics.