%0 Journal Article
%T Distal biceps tendon repair using a double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique.
%A Hochreiter B
%A Eckers F
%A Calek AK
%A Cassidy JT
%A Amaranath JE
%A Leung M
%A Ek ET
%J J Shoulder Elbow Surg
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Apr 28
%M 38688419
%F 3.507
%R 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.028
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Distal biceps tendon repair is usually performed via a double-incision or single-incision bicortical drilling technique. However, these techniques are associated with specific complications and usually do not allow for anatomic footprint restoration. It was the aim of this study to report the clinical results of a double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique for distal biceps tendon tears. We hypothesized that this technique would result in supination strength comparable to the uninjured side with a low rerupture rate and minimal bony or neurologic complications.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This was a retrospective, single-surgeon cohort study of a consecutive series of 22 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 50.7 (9.4) years and at least 1-year follow-up after distal biceps tendon repair. At final follow-up, complications, range of motion (ROM), the Patient-rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, patient satisfaction, and supination strength in neutral as well as 60° of supination were analyzed. Radiographic evaluation was performed on a computed tomography scan.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>One patient (4.5%) experienced slight paresthesia in the area of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Heterotopic ossification was seen in 1 patient (4.5%). All patients recovered full ROM except for 1 who had 10° of loss of flexion and extension. Median PREE score was 4.6 (0-39.6), median MEP was 100 (70-100), and median DASH score was 1.4 (0-16.7). All but 1 patient were very satisfied with the outcome. The affected arm had a mean of 98% (±13%) of neutral supination strength (P = .633) and 94% (±12%) of supination strength in 60° (P = .054) compared with the contralateral, unaffected side. There were 4 cases (18.2%) of cortical thinning due to at least 1 button and 1 case of button pullout (4.5%).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique seems to provide reliable restoration of supination strength and excellent patient satisfaction while minimizing complications, particularly nerve damage and heterotopic ossification.