%0 Systematic Review
%T A scoping review of high-fidelity bench models for teaching closed reduction of distal radial fractures.
%A Craig J
%A Walsh I
%J MedEdPublish (2016)
%V 10
%N 0
%D 2021
%M 38486554
暂无%R 10.15694/mep.2021.000088.1
%X This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended.<BR><B>BACKGROUND: </B>Simulation training can be beneficial for developing clinical skills without risks to patients. This review considers the literature on simulation models used for teaching closed reduction (manipulation) procedures for distal radius (wrist) fractures, particularly high-fidelity models, and the evidence supporting the use of such models.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A scoping review of Medline and Embase was performed.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Five articles described low-fidelity models, predominantly focussing on low costs and teaching basic principles. Three articles and two commentary pieces discussing high-fidelity models were identified.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Attitudes towards a high-fidelity simulator were assessed by Egan et al. (2013), who found the majority of participants to be in favour of the model's use as a teaching tool, although participant selection may have been subject to bias. Mayne et al. (2016) subsequently used a high-fidelity model including radio-opaque markers and more objective measurements tools to assess orthopaedic trainees' closed reduction technique and adequacy of the achieved fracture position and casting. Seniority correlated with higher scores on objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) and global rating scores (GRS) but not radiological measures of fracture position or cast quality, and over 90% of all participants achieved an adequate reduction. Seeley et al. (2017) used radiological measurements and time to task completion with another high-fidelity reduction model. The two most experienced participant groups could not be differentiated on any radiological measures of fracture reduction or on the time taken for reduction, although these groups were significantly better than the most junior participants.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The discussed models appear helpful to teach inexperienced participants the basic principles and steps in a procedures but a plateau effect appears to limit the potential benefit to more experienced learners. The constraints of educators' time and financial costs may influence the usage of such models in this type of training.