%0 Journal Article
%T Interobserver agreement of current and new proposed endoscopic scores for postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.
%A Bak MTJ
%A Hammoudi N
%A Allez M
%A Silverberg MS
%A Schellekens IM
%A Erler NS
%A Dijkstra G
%A Romberg-Camps M
%A de Boer NKH
%A Jansen SV
%A van der Marel S
%A Horjus CS
%A Visschedijk MC
%A Goetgebuer RL
%A van Dop WA
%A Hoekstra J
%A Bodelier AGL
%A Molendijk I
%A Derikx LAAP
%A van Schaik FDM
%A West RL
%A Duijvestein M
%A Janneke van der Woude C
%A van Ruler O
%A de Vries AC
%A
%J Gastrointest Endosc
%V 0
%N 0
%D 2024 Mar 8
%M 38462057
%F 10.396
%R 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.011
%X OBJECTIVE: The modified Rutgeerts score (mRS) is widely used for the assessment of endoscopic postoperative recurrence (ePOR) in Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocolic resection to guide therapeutic decisions. To improve the validity and prognostic value of this endoscopic assessment, 2 new scores have been proposed. This study assessed the interobserver agreement of the current score (mRS) and the new endoscopic score for ePOR in CD.
METHODS: Sixteen Dutch academic and nonacademic inflammatory bowel disease specialists assessed endoscopic videos (n = 71) of postoperative CD patients (n = 66) retrieved from 9 Dutch centers. Each video was assessed for degree of inflammation by 4 gastroenterologists using the mRS and the new proposed endoscopic score: the REMIND score (separate score of anastomosis and neoterminal ileum) and the updated Rutgeerts score (assessment of lesions at the anastomotic line, ileal inlet, ileal body, and neoterminal ileum). In addition, lesions at the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, and colonic and/or ileal blind loop were separately assessed. Interobserver agreement was assessed by using Fleiss' weighted kappa.
RESULTS: Fleiss' weighted kappa for the mRS was .67 (95% confidence interval [CI], .59-.74). The weighted kappa for the REMIND score was .73 (95% CI, .65-.80) for lesions in the neoterminal ileum and .46 (95% CI, .35-.58) for anastomotic lesions. The weighted kappa for the updated Rutgeerts score was .69 (95% CI, .62-.77). The weighted kappa for lesions in the ileal body, ileal inlet, neoterminal ileum, and colonic and ileal blind loop was .61 (95% CI, .49-.73), .63 (95% CI, .54-.72), .61 (95% CI, .49-.74), .83 (95% CI, .62-1.00) and .68 (95% CI, .46-.89), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The interobserver agreement of the mRS is substantial. Similarly, the interobserver agreement is substantial for the updated Rutgeerts score. According to the REMIND score, the interobserver agreement was substantial for lesions in the neoterminal ileum, although only moderate for anastomotic lesions. Because therapeutic decisions in clinical practice are based on these assessments, and these scores are used as outcome measure in clinical studies, further improvement of the interobserver agreement is essential.