%0 Journal Article %T A randomized double-blinded trial to assess recurrence of systemic allergic reactions following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. %A Khalid MB %A Zektser E %A Chu E %A Li M %A Utoh J %A Ryan P %A Loving HS %A Harb R %A Kattappuram R %A Chatman L %A Hartono S %A Claudio-Etienne E %A Sun G %A Feener EP %A Li Z %A Lai SK %A Le Q %A Schwartz LB %A Lyons JJ %A Komarow H %A Zhou ZH %A Raza H %A Pao M %A Laky K %A Holland SM %A Brittain E %A Frischmeyer-Guerrerio PA %J J Allergy Clin Immunol %V 153 %N 6 %D 2024 Jun 7 %M 38460680 %F 14.29 %R 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.03.001 %X BACKGROUND: Systemic allergic reactions (sARs) following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines were initially reported at a higher rate than after traditional vaccines.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety of revaccination in these individuals and to interrogate mechanisms underlying these reactions.
METHODS: In this randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial, participants aged 16 to 69 years who previously reported a convincing sAR to their first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were randomly assigned to receive a second dose of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) vaccine and placebo on consecutive days in a blinded, 1:1 crossover fashion at the National Institutes of Health. An open-label BNT162b2 booster was offered 5 months later if the second dose did not result in severe sAR. None of the participants received the mRNA-1273 (Spikevax) vaccine during the study. The primary end point was recurrence of sAR following second dose and booster vaccination; exploratory end points included biomarker measurements.
RESULTS: Of 111 screened participants, 18 were randomly assigned to receive study interventions. Eight received BNT162b2 second dose followed by placebo; 8 received placebo followed by BNT162b2 second dose; 2 withdrew before receiving any study intervention. All 16 participants received the booster dose. Following second dose and booster vaccination, sARs recurred in 2 participants (12.5%; 95% CI, 1.6 to 38.3). No sAR occurred after placebo. An anaphylaxis mimic, immunization stress-related response (ISRR), occurred more commonly than sARs following both vaccine and placebo and was associated with higher predose anxiety scores, paresthesias, and distinct vital sign and biomarker changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support revaccination of individuals who report sARs to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Distinct clinical and laboratory features may distinguish sARs from ISRRs.