%0 Meta-Analysis
%T What exercise programme is the most appropriate to mitigate anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in football (soccer) players? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
%A Magaña-Ramírez M
%A Gallardo-Gómez D
%A Álvarez-Barbosa F
%A Corral-Pernía JA
%J J Sci Med Sport
%V 27
%N 4
%D 2024 Apr 7
%M 38395699
%F 4.597
%R 10.1016/j.jsams.2024.02.001
%X OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of different exercise-based interventions to mitigate the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in football players, and to determine which is the most appropriate for them, specifically for female football players.
METHODS: Four databases were accessed in July 2023 using the keywords football, soccer, athletic injuries, anterior cruciate ligament, knee injuries, injury prevention, exercise-based programme, and risk factor.
METHODS: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated any exercise-based injury prevention intervention compared with a control group on the prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injury in football players were included.
RESULTS: Eleven studies were included. Data were presented as logarithm hazard ratio, credible intervals and standard deviation. FIFA 11+ was the most effective in reducing anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in football players (logarithm hazard ratio = -1.23 [95% credible intervals: -2.20, -0.35]; SD = 0.47), followed by the Knäkontroll programme (logarithm hazard ratio = -0.76 [95% credible intervals: -1.60, -0.03]; standard deviation = 0.42). For females, only Knäkontroll had a significant impact on reducing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury (logarithm hazard ratio = -0.62 [95% credible intervals: -1.71, 0.62]; standard deviation = 0.58).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the use of FIFA 11+ and Knäkontroll to mitigate injury incidence at overall level. However, the effectiveness of these interventions changed when adjusting for females. Knäkontroll is postulated as the programme with the greatest preventive nature, although these results should be interpreted with caution due to the lack of the sample.