%0 Journal Article
%T Comparison of Different Acellular Dermal Matrix in Breast Reconstruction: A Skin-to-Skin Study.
%A Davison SP
%A Harbour S
%A Fassihi E
%J Aesthet Surg J
%V 44
%N 8
%D 2024 Jul 15
%M 38377366
%F 4.485
%R 10.1093/asj/sjae035
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Since the early 2000s, acellular dermal matrix has been a popular adjunct to prepectoral breast reconstruction to enhance outcomes.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the postoperative course of 2 standard acellular dermal matrix products, AlloDerm SELECT Ready To Use and DermACELL.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A prospective, patient-blind study of patients undergoing bilateral nipple and/or skin-sparing mastectomies with either tissue expander or silicone implant insertion between 2019 and 2022 were selected for this study. The study design used patients as their own controls between 2 products randomly assigned to the left or right breast. Outcomes between the products included average time for drain removal, infection rate, seroma rate, and incorporation rates.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The prospective clinical data of 55 patients (110 breasts) were recorded for 90 days. There were no significant differences between drain removal time, average drain output, or seroma aspiration amount. A higher percentage of seromas was recorded in the breasts with AlloDerm (30.91%) compared with breasts containing DermACELL (14.55%, P < .05), and a statistically significant difference between the incorporation rates of AlloDerm (93.4%) and DermACELL (99.8%, P < .05) was observed.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Irrespective of patient demographic disparities, both products had a 94.55% success rate for reconstruction outcomes. AlloDerm was determined to have a higher incidence of seromas as a postoperative complication and a trend to lower incorporation.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>