%0 Journal Article
%T Laparoscopic vs open surgery for gastric cancer: Assessing time, recovery, complications, and markers.
%A Lu YY
%A Li YX
%A He M
%A Wang YL
%J World J Gastrointest Surg
%V 16
%N 1
%D 2024 Jan 27
%M 38328321
暂无%R 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i1.40
%X BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Morbidity and mortality have increased in recent years, making it an urgent issue to address. Laparoscopic radical surgery (LRS) is a crucial method for treating patients with GC; However, its influence on tumor markers is still under investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of LRS on patients with GC and their serum tumor markers.
METHODS: The data of 194 patients treated at Chongqing University Cancer Hospital between January 2018 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who underwent traditional open surgery and LRS were assigned to the control (n = 90) and observation groups (n = 104), respectively. Independent sample t-tests and χ2 tests were used to compare the two groups based on clinical efficacy, changes in tumor marker levels after treatment, clinical data, and the incidence of postoperative complications. To investigate the association between tumor marker levels and clinical efficacy in patients with GC, three-year recurrence rates in the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: Patients in the observation group had a shorter duration of operation, less intraoperative blood loss, an earlier postoperative eating time, and a shorter hospital stay than those in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node dissections (P > 0.05). After treatment, the overall response rate in the control group was significantly lower than that in the observation group (P = 0.001). Furthermore, after treatment, the levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9, cancer antigen 72-4, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cancer antigen 125 decreased significantly. The observation group also exhibited a significantly lower incidence rate of postoperative complications compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the two groups did not significantly differ in terms of three-year survival and recurrence rates (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: LRS effectively treats early gastric cancer by reducing intraoperative bleeding, length of hospital stays, and postoperative complications. It also significantly lowers tumor marker levels, thus improving the short-term prognosis of the disease.