%0 Journal Article
%T Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of angiosarcoma of the head and neck: A 17-year single-centre experience.
%A Evans J
%A Chang C
%A Jones C
%A Anderson I
%A Berner JE
%A Crowley TP
%A Ragbir M
%J J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
%V 88
%N 0
%D 2024 Jan 29
%M 38091688
%F 3.022
%R 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.11.039
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Angiosarcomas in the head and neck region are aggressive tumours associated with high local recurrence and metastatic rates. We present our 17-year experience at the North of England Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Service.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was undertaken, looking for patients diagnosed with angiosarcomas affecting the head and neck. Data were gathered using a pre-defined proforma to include demographics, histological characteristics, treatment modalities, adjuvant therapies, local recurrence, distant spread, and disease-specific survival.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>A total of 23 patients (17 males, 6 females) were identified, with a mean age of 76 years at presentation. Fourteen presented with scalp lesions, whereas the remainder arose on the face. Eighteen patients underwent resection with curative intent, whereas three received palliative radiotherapy and two received comfort-based care only. Of the patients undergoing surgery, 12 had local flap reconstruction and 6 underwent free tissue transfer. Clear resection margins were obtained in nine cases (50%). Fourteen patients (78%) presented with local recurrence after surgery, and 11 (61%) developed distant metastases. The median disease-specific survival time for patients treated with curative intent was 38 months. Eight patients had mapping biopsies ahead of their resection; however, complete resection was achieved in only two cases.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Angiosarcomas of the head and neck are associated with a poor prognosis, with most patients rapidly developing local recurrence, resulting in adverse clinical outcomes. Mapping biopsies do not demonstrate a clear advantage for achieving complete surgical resection. A radical surgical approach is warranted, given the aggressiveness of the pathology. However, there remains no consensus on optimal surgical management; we recommend further synthesising studies to determine the most appropriate treatment pathway.