%0 Journal Article
%T Influence of Ocular Biometry Parameters on the Predictive Accuracy of IOL Power Formulas in Patients with High Myopia.
%A Miao A
%A Lin P
%A Ren S
%A Xu J
%A Yang F
%A Qian D
%A Lu Y
%A Zheng T
%J Ophthalmol Ther
%V 13
%N 1
%D 2024 Jan 4
%M 38048035
暂无%R 10.1007/s40123-023-00856-0
%X BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of ocular biometry parameters on the predictive accuracy of 10 intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas in patients with high myopia (HM).
METHODS: We analyzed 202 eyes of 202 patients. The ocular biometry was determined preoperatively using an IOLMaster 700. The associations between the biometry parameters and the prediction error (PE) 1 month postoperatively were assessed. HM was defined as an axial length exceeding 26.50 mm.
RESULTS: In patients with HM (n = 108), the K6, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Olsen, and Barrett Universal II (BUII) formulas had the lowest absolute PEs among the 10 formulas. The ocular biometry parameters were not associated with the PE of K6, EVO, Olsen, or BUII. A longer axial length in HM eyes was associated with myopic outcomes by Kane, Hoffer QST, and VRF and hyperopic outcomes by Holladay 2 and T2. Steeper keratometry, a deeper anterior chamber, and a thicker lens were associated with a hyperopic shift in HM eyes when using VRF, Kane, and Hoffer QST, respectively. In patients without HM (n = 94), there was no difference between the formulas in absolute PE. The significant associations between the biometry parameters and PE in patients with HM were not present in patients without HM.
CONCLUSIONS: K6, EVO, Olsen, and BUII displayed high accuracy in HM eyes and were not influenced by preoperative biometry parameters. For the remaining formulas, the preoperative keratometry, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and axial length were possible error sources underlying an inaccurate IOL power prediction in patients with HM.