%0 Journal Article %T Melanoma clinicopathological groups characterized and compared with dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy. %A Faldetta C %A Kaleci S %A Chester J %A Ruini C %A Ciardo S %A Manfredini M %A Guida S %A Chello C %A Cantisani C %A Young JN %A Cabral P %A Gulati N %A Guttman-Yassky E %A Pellacani G %A Farnetani F %J J Am Acad Dermatol %V 90 %N 2 %D 2024 Feb 19 %M 37988042 %F 15.487 %R 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.09.084 %X BACKGROUND: Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) correlations between morphologic groups of melanoma have not yet been described.
OBJECTIVE: Describe and compare dermoscopic and RCM features of cutaneous melanomas with histopathological confirmation.
METHODS: Single center, retrospective analysis of consecutive melanomas evaluated with RCM (2015-2019). Lesions were clinically classified as typical, nevus-like, amelanotic/nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC)-like, seborrheic keratosis (SK)-like and lentigo/lentigo maligna (LM)-like. Presence or absence of common facial and nonfacial melanoma dermoscopic and RCM patterns were recorded. Clusters were compared with typical lesions by multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among 583 melanoma lesions, significant differences between clusters were evident (compared to typical lesions). Observation of dermoscopic features (>50% of lesions) in amelanotic/NMSC-like lesions consistently displayed 3 patterns (atypical network, atypical vascular pattern + regression structures), and nevus-like and SK-like lesions and lentigo/LM-like lesions consistently displayed 2 patterns (atypical network + regression structures, and nonevident follicles + heavy pigmentation intensity). Differences were less evident with RCM, as almost all lesions were consistent with melanoma diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Small SK-like lesions sample, single RCM analyses (no reproduction of outcome).
CONCLUSIONS: RCM has the potential to augment our ability to consistently and accurately diagnose melanoma independently of clinical and dermoscopic features.