%0 Randomized Controlled Trial
%T Efficacy of Pulsed Field vs Radiofrequency for the Reablation of Chronic Radiofrequency Ablation Substrate: Redo Pulsed Field Ablation.
%A Younis A
%A Buck E
%A Santangeli P
%A Tabaja C
%A Garrott K
%A Lehn L
%A Hussein AA
%A Nakhla S
%A Nakagawa H
%A Yavin HD
%A Kanj M
%A Sroubek J
%A Saliba WI
%A Wazni OM
%J JACC Clin Electrophysiol
%V 10
%N 2
%D 2024 Feb
%M 37978965
%F 6.124
%R 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.09.015
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>The efficacy of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for redo procedures is unknown.<BR><B>OBJECTIVE: </B>In this study, the authors aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PFA when performing PFA over chronic RFA (redo environment).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>This was a 3-step in vivo study. In step 1 (creation of redo environment), 6 swine underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with a local impedance measuring catheter and a contact force-enabled catheter in 3 different sites: the right atrium (RA) (intercaval line with intentional gaps), the left atrium (LA) (pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] with intentional gaps and superficial posterior wall ablations), and the left ventricle (LV) (short RFA applications [chronic RFA]). In step 2 (re-ablation), following a survival period of ≈5 weeks, animals were retreated as follows: in the RA, a focal PFA catheter over the prior intercaval line; in the LA, PVI using a pentaspline PFA catheter; and in the LV, animals were randomized to focal PFA or RFA. In each arm, 2 types of lesions were performed: acute or acute over chronic. In step 3 (remapping and euthanization), following an additional 3 to 5 days, all animals were remapped and sacrificed.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>In the RA, re-ablation with PFA resulted in a complete intercaval block in all animals, expanding and homogenizing the disparate chronic RFA lesions from a width of 4 to 7 mm (chronic RFA) to a width of 16 to 28 mm (PFA over chronic RFA). In the LA, re-ablation with PFA resulted in complete PVI and transmural ablation of the PW. In the LV, the mean depth for acute RFA (post 2-5 days survival) was 7.6 ± 1.3 mm vs 3.9 ± 1.6 mm in the acute over chronic RFA lesions (P < 0.01). In contrast, the mean depth for acute PFA was 7.0 ± 1.6 mm, similar to when ablating with PFA over RFA (7.1 ± 1.3 mm; P = 0.94).<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>PFA is highly efficient for ablation following prior RFA, which may be beneficial in patients presenting for redo procedures. In the ventricle, PFA resulted in lesions that are deeper than RFA when ablating over chronic superficial RFA lesions.