%0 Journal Article
%T Removal of α1-Microglobulin Using Post-Dilution Online Hemodiafiltration with Polymethylmethacrylate Membrane: An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study.
%A Yoshida S
%A Yamamoto S
%A Miyauchi D
%A Terashima R
%A Hashimoto A
%A Miyazawa H
%A Tanaka T
%A Ishizawa M
%A Tanaka M
%A Tomita Y
%A Aoike I
%A Goto S
%A Narita I
%J Blood Purif
%V 53
%N 2
%D 2024 Nov 8
%M 37939684
%F 3.348
%R 10.1159/000534459
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>The removal of low- and medium-molecular-weight proteins has been improved with online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) and hemodialysis using high-flux membranes; however, the outcomes of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) undergoing dialysis treatment are still worse than in the general population. α1-Microglobulin (α1-m), with a molecular weight of 33,000 Da, may contribute to dialysis-related disorders and mortality. However, the removal is insufficient even with current OL-HDF using the polysulfone (PS) membrane, which is common in Japan. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membranes can remove medium- to high-molecular-weight proteins by adsorption. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of removing medium- to high-molecular-weight proteins, such as α1-m and β2-microglobulin (β2-m), through post-dilution OL-HDF with PMMA (Post-PMMA). The assessment was conducted in comparison to pre-dilution OL-HDF with PS (Pre-PS), using an open-label, single-arm study.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Seven patients with ESKD on Pre-PS underwent Post-PMMA with replacement volume of 30 mL/min (low flow) and 50 mL/min (high flow). Clearance and removal rates of α1-m, β2-m, small molecules, inflammatory cytokines, and albumin were measured at 60 and 240 min of treatment.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Clearance rates of α1-m at 60 min were -2.8 ± 5.2 mL/min with Pre-PS, -0.4 ± 2.6 mL/min with Post-PMMA (low), and 0.6 ± 3.4 mL/min with Post-PMMA (high). The removal rate of α1-m was higher in Post-PMMA than that in Pre-HDF-PS (Post-PMMA [high] 17.7 ± 5.9%, Post-PMMA [low] 15.0 ± 5.6%, and Pre-PS 4.1 ± 5.5%). Adsorption clearance of β2-m was increased with Post-PMMA. Albumin leakage in Post-PMMA was not higher than that in Pre-PS.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The removal rate of α1-m with Post-PMMA was higher than that with Pre-PS. The PMMA membrane adsorbed β2-m, suggesting the removal effect of medium- to high-molecular-weight proteins by the adsorption method. Since Post-PMMA effectively removes α1-m without excessive albumin leakage, it will be useful for patients with ESKD, especially those with a poor nutritional status.