%0 Journal Article
%T ChatGPT performance in laryngology and head and neck surgery: a clinical case-series.
%A Lechien JR
%A Georgescu BM
%A Hans S
%A Chiesa-Estomba CM
%J Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
%V 281
%N 1
%D 2024 Jan 24
%M 37874336
%F 3.236
%R 10.1007/s00405-023-08282-5
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To study the performance of ChatGPT in the management of laryngology and head and neck (LHN) cases.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>History and clinical examination of patients consulting at the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery department were presented to ChatGPT, which was interrogated for differential diagnosis, management, and treatment. The ChatGPT performance was assessed by two blinded board-certified otolaryngologists using the following items of a composite score and the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool: differential diagnosis; additional examination; and treatment options. The complexity of clinical cases was evaluated with the Amsterdam Clinical Challenge Scale test.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Forty clinical cases were submitted to ChatGPT, accounting for 14 (35%), 12 (30%), and 14 (35%) easy, moderate and difficult cases, respectively. ChatGPT indicated a significant higher number of additional examinations compared to practitioners (p = 0.001). There was a significant agreement between practitioners and ChatGPT for the indication of some common examinations (audiometry, ultrasonography, biopsy, gastrointestinal endoscopy or videofluoroscopy). ChatGPT never indicated some important additional examinations (PET-CT, voice quality assessment, or impedance-pH monitoring). ChatGPT reported highest performance in the proposition of the primary (90%) or the most plausible differential diagnoses (65%), and the therapeutic options (60-68%). The ChatGPT performance in the indication of additional examinations was lowest.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>ChatGPT is a promising adjunctive tool in LHN practice, providing extensive documentation about disease-related additional examinations, differential diagnoses, and treatments. The ChatGPT is more efficient in diagnosis and treatment, rather than in the selection of the most adequate additional examination.