%0 Journal Article
%T Comparative study on the clinical outcomes and prognosis of endovascular embolization and craniotomy clipping for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.
%A Li G
%A Chen S
%A Han J
%A Pan W
%A Ji P
%J Pak J Med Sci
%V 39
%N 5
%D 2023 Sep-Oct
%M 37680810
%F 2.34
%R 10.12669/pjms.39.5.7401
%X <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>To investigate the safety and outcomes of endovascular embolization and craniotomy clipping in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>We collected the clinical data of 106 patients with cerebral aneurysm who underwent surgical treatment (endovascular embolization, Group-A, n=55; craniotomy clipping, Group-B, n=51) in the First People's Hospital of Yichang from January 2020 to May 2021. We compared surgical treatment indexes, treatment costs, neurological function before and after the treatment, incidence of postoperative complications and the prognosis after one-year follow-up between the two groups.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Endovascular embolization (Group-A) was associated with a shorter mean operation time and hospital stay, a lower mean intraoperative bleeding amount, and a higher mean treatment cost than craniotomy clipping (Group-B) (P<0.05). Compared with the pre-operative neurological function scores, the scores of both groups decreased after the surgery, and the mean post-operative score of Group-A was significantly lower than that of Group-B (P<0.05). Compared with Group-B , patients in Group-A had a lower overall complication rate (P < 0.05. Higher proportion of patients in Group-A had a good prognosis (P < 0.05).<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Endovascular embolization for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms is safe as it can shorten the operation time and hospital stay, reduce the incidence of neurological injury and complications, and have a favorable prognosis. However, the treatment is more expensive. Endovascular embolization can be selected for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms when economic conditions allow it.