%0 Journal Article
%T Transoral versus transfacial surgical approach to maxillary tumors: evaluation of outcomes and perspectives.
%A Pucci R
%A Cassoni A
%A Weyh A
%A Mangini N
%A Della Monaca M
%A Battisti A
%A Fernandes R
%A Valentini V
%J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
%V 53
%N 2
%D 2024 Feb 2
%M 37271627
%F 2.986
%R 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.006
%X Neoplasms of the maxilla have multiple different origins and histology, and often extend towards the infratemporal fossa, orbit, or skull base. Extensive resection may be required, often leading to poor esthetic and functional results. Usually, these lesions are removed via a transfacial approach. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of the transoral versus transfacial approach for maxillary tumors. A single-institution retrospective study was conducted on patients with maxillary-midface tumors, treated between January 2009 and December 2019. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach, transfacial or transoral, and the following outcomes were assessed: extent of the resection based on Brown's classification; postoperative pathology margin assessment; reconstruction technique; esthetic/functional results. A total of 178 patients were included. A satisfactory resection was obtained in both groups, with the transoral cohort achieving a higher rate of clear oncological margins (positive margins: transoral group 3.7% versus transfacial group 6.8%, P = 0.389) and a significantly higher University of Washington Quality of Life score (mean 72.2 versus 67.8, P < 0.001). Even large and invasive tumors can be treated successfully with the transoral approach, avoiding unesthetic facial scars while still providing complete resection of the tumor.