%0 Journal Article
%T Quantifying the direct and indirect effects of sika deer (Cervus nippon) on the prevalence of infection with Rickettsia in questing Haemaphysalis megaspinosa: A field experimental study.
%A Matsuyama H
%A Doi K
%A Agetsuma N
%A Suzuki M
%J Ticks Tick Borne Dis
%V 14
%N 5
%D 2023 09 26
%M 37245254
%F 3.817
%R 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2023.102201
%X Sika deer (Cervus nippon) are important hosts for all life stages of Haemaphysalis megaspinosa, a suspected Rickettsia vector. Because some Rickettsia are unlikely to be amplified by deer in Japan, the presence of deer may decrease the prevalence of Rickettsia infection in questing H. megaspinosa. As sika deer decrease vegetation cover and height and thereby indirectly cause changes in the abundance of other hosts, including reservoirs of Rickettsia, the prevalence of Rickettsia infection in questing ticks can also change. We investigated these possible effects of deer on the prevalence of infection with Rickettsia in questing ticks in a field experiment in which deer density was manipulated at three fenced sites: a deer enclosure (Deer-enclosed site); a deer enclosure where deer had been present until 2015 and only indirect effects remained (Indirect effect site); and a deer exclosure in place since 2004 (Deer-exclosed site). Density of questing nymphs and the prevalence of infection with Rickettsia sp. 1 in questing nymphs at each site were compared from 2018 to 2020. The nymph density at the Deer-exclosed site did not significantly differ from that at the Indirect effect site, suggesting that the deer herbivory did not affect the nymph density by reducing vegetation and increasing the abundance of other host mammals. However, the prevalence of infection with Rickettsia sp. 1 in questing nymphs was higher at the Deer-exclosed site than at the Deer-enclosed site, possibly because ticks utilized alternative hosts when deer were absent. The difference in Rickettsia sp. 1 prevalence between the Indirect effect and Deer-exclosed sites was comparable to that between the Indirect effect and Deer-enclosed sites, indicating that the indirect effects of deer were as strong as the direct effects. Examining the indirect effects of ecosystem engineers in the study of tick-borne diseases may be more important than previously recognized.