%0 Journal Article
%T Whole-Genome Sequencing Exhibits Better Diagnostic Performance than Variable-Number Tandem Repeats for Identifying Mixed Infections of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
%A Chen Y
%A Jiang Q
%A Liu Q
%A Gan M
%A Takiff HE
%A Gao Q
%J Microbiol Spectr
%V 11
%N 3
%D 2023 06 15
%M 37098911
%F 9.043
%R 10.1128/spectrum.03570-22
%X Mixed infections of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, defined as the coexistence of multiple genetically distinct strains within a single host, have been associated with unfavorable treatment outcomes. Different methods have been used to detect mixed infections, but their performances have not been carefully evaluated. To compare the sensitivity of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR) typing to detect mixed infections, we prepared 10 artificial samples composed of DNA mixtures from two strains in different proportions and retrospectively collected 1,084 clinical isolates. The limit of detection (LOD) for the presence of a minor strain was 5% for both WGS and VNTR typing. The overall clinical detection rate of mixed infections was 3.7% (40/1,084) for the two methods combined, WGS identified 37/1,084 (3.4%), and VNTR typing identified 14/1,084 (1.3%), including 11 also identified by WGS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that retreatment patients had a 2.7 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 6.0) higher risk of mixed infections than new cases. Collectively, WGS is a more reliable tool to identify mixed infections than VNTR typing, and mixed infections are more common in retreated patients. IMPORTANCE Mixed infections of M. tuberculosis have the potential to render treatment regimens ineffective and affect the transmission dynamics of the disease. VNTR typing, currently the most widely used method for the detection of mixed infections, detects mixed infections only by interrogating a small fraction of the M. tuberculosis genome, which necessarily limits sensitivity. With the introduction of WGS, it became possible to study the entire genome, but no quantitative comparison has yet been undertaken. Our systematic comparison of the ability of WGS and VNTR typing to detect mixed infections, using both artificial samples and clinical isolates, revealed the superior performance of WGS at a high sequencing depth (~100×) and found that mixed infections are more common in patients being retreated for tuberculosis (TB) in the populations studied. This provides valuable information for the application of WGS in the detection of mixed infections and the implications of mixed infections for tuberculosis control.