%0 Case Reports
%T [Differential diagnostic between hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatoid carcinoma with bone metastasis revelation: What tools can be used?]
%A Neyrand S
%A Bringuier PP
%A Benzerdjeb N
%A Hervieu V
%A Fenouil T
%J Ann Pathol
%V 43
%N 5
%D Sep 2023 21
%M 36822899
%F 0.411
%R 10.1016/j.annpat.2023.01.004
%X Bone metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are rare and disease-revealing bone metastasis are exceptional. Here, we report the case of a 69-year-old man with a cervical vertebral metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Morphological aspect of a metastatic tumor with eosinophilic and polygonal cells raises the question of the differential diagnosis between a localization of a hepatocellular carcinoma or an hepatoid carcinoma, notably when the metastasis is the first clinical manifestation. The morphological aspect by itself does not provide strong enough arguments for diagnosis. Well selected immunohistochemical markers can sometimes help to orientate towards one of the two hypotheses, in particular SALL4 and LIN28 which are in favour of hepatoid carcinoma when both are positive. Finally, as these two entities have different molecular profiles, molecular study can also be helpful to distinguish them. Indeed, HCCs often present TERT promoter, CTNNB1 mutations and IL-6/JAK/STAT pathway activation while hepatoid adenocarcinoma frequently presents chromosome 20 long arm gain. TP53 mutations are found in both entities and are therefore not discriminating. Differential diagnosis is important because the treatment will be that of the primary. Prognostic data for HCC revealed by bone metastasis are scarce, although they seem to be associated with a poor prognosis, with a 1 to 2 months overall survival. There is currently no data for hepatoid adenocarcinoma with bone metastasis.