%0 Case Reports
%T Prenatal diagnosis of Noonan syndrome in a set of monozygotic twins- a case report.
%A Jian W
%A Yuan H
%A Liu Y
%A Sun J
%A Chen F
%A Li Y
%A Chen M
%J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
%V 23
%N 1
%D Jan 2023 6
%M 36609239
%F 3.105
%R 10.1186/s12884-022-05323-5
%X BACKGROUND: We report a pair of dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) twin pregnancy affected by Noonan syndrome (NS) with a novel mutation of LZTR1 determined by genetic analysis.
METHODS: A pregnant woman with monozygotic twins (DCDA) at 12 + 2 weeks gestation was referred to our center. This was her second pregnancy following a previous delivery of a healthy infant. Nuchal translucency of two fetuses was 11.2 mm (CRL 62.0 mm) and 6.9 mm (CRL 62.1 mm) respectively. Ultrasound examination indicated cystic hygroma and hypoplastic ear. The couple was not consanguineous, and both had normal phenotype. Familial hereditary disease was also excluded. Under ultrasound guidance, 30 mg of chorionic villi was obtained for karyotyping, quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR), chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA), and Trio-whole-exome sequencing(WES) examination. We used the "target region capture and sequencing" for WES, and the BWA (Burrows Wheeler Aligner) Multi-Vision software package for the data analysis. The results of all these tests were normal except WES detected a c.427 A > G mutation in the exonic region of the LZTR1 gene and a p. Asn143Asp novel heterozygous mutation associated with NS in this pair of twins. In addition, WES suggested that the mutation in the twin fetuses originated from the mother. When the mother got the genetic test report, she came to our fetal medicine department for genetic counseling and she declined the appointment with a clinical geneticist. The couple opted to terminate the pregnancy. Because the patient did not choose to terminate the pregnancy at our hospital, we were unable to take further examination. With the help of colleagues in another hospital, photos of the fetuses were taken. Compared with the prenatal ultrasound results, the appearance of the "cystic hygroma" and "hypoplastic ear" was consistent with the ultrasound. The couple were depressed after knowing this pathogenic result and although we advised the mother to take further investigation, they refused.
CONCLUSIONS: The mutant locus might be incompletely dominant, which led to an abnormal fetal phenotype such as cystic hygroma and hypoplastic ear.