%0 Meta-Analysis
%T A systematic review and meta-analysis of the hemodynamic effects of etomidate versus other sedatives in patients undergoing rapid sequence intubation.
%A Arteaga Velásquez J
%A Rodríguez JJ
%A Higuita-Gutiérrez LF
%A Montoya Vergara ME
%J Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed)
%V 69
%N 10
%D Dec 2022
%M 36241514
暂无%R 10.1016/j.redare.2021.05.020
%X <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Rapid sequence intubation is an airway rescue and protection technique in which different sedatives are used to perform orotracheal intubation. Etomidate, due to its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic qualities, particularly hemodynamic stability, is the most widely used sedative in this scenario. However, its superiority over other sedatives is controversial.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We performed a meta-analysis using a pre-designed protocol and PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the mean difference between systolic blood pressure before and after administration of the sedative. We also analyzed the relative risks of hypotension.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Ten studies were included. The incidence of hypotension in patients receiving etomidate ranged from 6.4% to 75.2%, and between 24.0% and 65.9% in patients receiving other sedatives. No significant differences were found in the mean difference in systolic blood pressure during pre-intubation 0.01 mm Hg (95% CI: -0.90; 0.92) or in post-intubation 0.98 mmHg (95% CI: -0.24; 2.20). The relative risk analysis showed that the risk of hypotension is equal to an RR of 1.19 (95% CI: 0.92-1.54) between those who received etomidate and those who received the other sedatives.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>The risk of hypotension after rapid intubation sequence with etomidate does not differ significantly compared to other sedatives. However, the studies included in this review were heterogeneous.