%0 Journal Article
%T Does power setting impact surgical outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
%A Pirola GM
%A Castellani D
%A Maggi M
%A Lim EJ
%A Chan VWS
%A Naselli A
%A Teoh JYC
%A Gauhar V
%A Pirola GM
%A Castellani D
%A Maggi M
%A Lim EJ
%A Chan VWS
%A Naselli A
%A Teoh JYC
%A Gauhar V
%J Cent European J Urol
%V 75
%N 2
%D 2022
%M 35937664
暂无%R 10.5173/ceju.2022.0104
%X UNASSIGNED: The aim of this article was to enumerate the differences in immediate and postoperative outcomes for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) performed with low-power (LP) or high-power (HP) laser settings through a systematic review of comparative studies.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. Potential clinical differences among LP and HP HoLEP were determined using the PICOS (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study type) model, where outcomes were surgical time, operative efficiency, postoperative catheterization time, length of hospital stay, blood transfusion, incontinence rate, maximum urinary flow rate (QMax) and International Prostatic Symptom score (IPSS). Retrospective, prospective nonrandomized, randomized studies, and meeting abstracts were considered.
UNASSIGNED: A total of five studies were included for meta-analysis. No significant differences between LP and HP HoLEP were evidenced in terms of intraoperative variables (surgical time, surgical efficiency); postoperative outcomes (length of stay, length of catheterization); postoperative complications; functional results (IPSS; Qmax). Urinary incontinence rate did not differ between the two groups (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.362.47, p = 0.91).
UNASSIGNED: The study shows equal outcomes in outcomes from HoLEP performed with LP or HP energy settings. Even if further comparative studies are still needed to increase the level of evidence, those results encourage a further clinical adoption of LP HoLEP.