%0 Journal Article
%T Ocular proton therapy, pencil beam scanning high energy proton therapy or stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanoma; an in silico study.
%A Gerard A
%A Peyrichon ML
%A Vidal M
%A Barnel C
%A Sauerwein W
%A Carnicer A
%A Angellier G
%A Mathis TM
%A Mishra KK
%A Thariat J
%A Herault J
%J Cancer Radiother
%V 26
%N 8
%D Nov 2022 5
%M 35803862
%F 1.217
%R 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.03.003
%X OBJECTIVE: In radiotherapy, the dose and volumes of the irradiated normal tissues is correlated to the complication rate. We assessed the performances of low-energy proton therapy (ocular PT) with eye-dedicated equipment, high energy PT with pencil-beam scanning (PBS) or CyberKnifeR -based stereotactic irradiation (SBRT).
METHODS: CT-based comparative dose distribution between external beam radiotherapy techniques was assessed using an anthropomorphic head phantom. The prescribed dose was 60Gy_RBE in 4 fractions to a typical posterior pole uveal melanoma. Clinically relevant structures were delineated, and doses were calculated using radiotherapy treatment planning softwares and measured using Gafchromic dosimetry films inserted at the ocular level.
RESULTS: Precision was significantly better with ocular PT than both PBS or SBRT in terms of beam penumbra (80%-20%: laterally 1.4 vs. ≥10mm, distally 0.8 vs. ≥2.5mm). Ocular PT duration was shorter, allowing eye gating and lid sparing more easily. Tumor was excellent with all modalities, but ocular PT resulted in more homogenous and conformal dose compared to PBS or SBRT. The maximal dose to ocular/orbital structures at risk was smaller and often null with ocular PT compared to other modalities. Mean dose to ocular/orbital structures was also lower with ocular PT. Structures like the lids and lacrimal punctum could be preserved with ocular PT using gaze orientation and lid retractors, which is easier to implement clinically than with the other modalities. The dose to distant organs was null with ocular PT and PBS, in contrast to SBRT.
CONCLUSIONS: ocular PT showed significantly improved beam penumbra, shorter treatment delivery time, better dose homogeneity, and reduced maximal/mean doses to critical ocular structures compared with other current external beam radiation modalities. Similar comparisons may be warranted for other tumor presentations.