%0 Meta-Analysis
%T Which Test Is the Best to Assess Visuo-Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Parkinson's Disease with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
%A Liebermann-Jordanidis H
%A Roheger M
%A Boosfeld L
%A Franklin J
%A Kalbe E
%J J Parkinsons Dis
%V 12
%N 6
%D 2022
%M 35599499
%F 5.52
%R 10.3233/JPD-223238
%X Visuo-cognitive impairment is common in patients with Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI) and constitutes a prognostic factor for the conversion to Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). However, systematic analyses on which neuropsychological tests are most suitable to assess visuo-cognition in PD-MCI and PDD and to differentiate these cognitive stages are lacking.
To review neuropsychological tests used to assess visuo-cognition including visuo-perceptual and visuo-spatial processing, visuo-constructive copying and drawing on command abilities; and to identify the visuo-cognitive subdomain as well as tests most suitable to discriminate between PD-MCI and PDD.
MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and CENTRAL were systematically searched for relevant studies assessing visuo-cognitive outcomes in patients with PD-MCI and PDD. Risk of bias was assessed using a customized form based on well-established tools. Random-effect meta-analyses were conducted.
33 studies were included in the systematic review. Data of 19 studies were entered in meta-analyses. Considerable heterogeneity regarding applied tests, test versions, and scoring systems exists. Data indicate that visuo-constructive command tasks are the subdomain best suited to discriminate between PD-MCI and PDD. Furthermore, they indicate that the Rey-Osterrieth-Complex-Figure Test (ROCF), Corsi Block-Tapping Test, Judgment of Line Orientation (JLO), and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) are tests able to differentiate between the two stages.
We provide suggestions for suitable visuo-cognitive tests (Corsi Block-Tapping Test, or JLO, ROCF, CDT) to improve diagnostic accuracy. Methodological challenges (e.g., heterogeneity of definitions, tests) are discussed and suggestions for future research are provided.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, ID: CRD42018088244.