%0 Journal Article
%T A prospective clinical study investigating the effectiveness of partial pulpotomy after relating preoperative symptoms to a new and established classification of pulpitis.
%A Careddu R
%A Duncan HF
%J Int Endod J
%V 54
%N 12
%D Dec 2021
%M 34490637
%F 5.165
%R 10.1111/iej.13629
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To prospectively investigate the outcome of partial pulpotomy after 1 year, using a hydraulic calcium silicate cement (HCSC) on symptomatic cariously exposed pulps in adult teeth. To compare the traditional American Association of Endodontists (AAE) pulpitis classification with the recently proposed Wolters classification system in predicting the likelihood of treatment failure.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Sixty-two symptomatic adult teeth with deep and extremely deep carious lesions were classified according to the Wolters (mild/moderate/severe pulpitis) and the traditional pulpitis classification (reversible/irreversible pulpitis). Eleven teeth were excluded intraoperatively as there was no pulp exposure after non-selective caries removal. The remaining 51 teeth, regardless of diagnosis, were treated by partial pulpotomy, pulpal lavage with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution, haemostasis and HCSC application (Biodentine™) as a pulp capping material. A permanent restoration was placed during a second appointment 1-2 weeks later. Preoperative tenderness to percussion (TTP), bleeding time and material setting time were recorded as was preoperative and postoperative tooth colour under standardized conditions. Clinical review occurred at regular intervals with clinical/radiographic analysis at 12 months. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test assessed different outcomes amongst the diagnostic categories; the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum test assessed influence of pulp bleeding time, TTP or variation in setting time (p < .05).<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>Ten cases were lost to review, and a total of 41 teeth were reviewed at 1 year and classified as either "success," "successful but unresponsive to sensibility testing" or "failed." This included five severe, 17 moderate and 19 mild pulpitis according to Wolters classification or 23 reversible pulpitis and 18 irreversible pulpitis cases by the AAE classification. The majority of the 62 enrolled cases were "extremely deep" (n = 50), rather than "deep" (n = 12) caries with all failures occurring in the extremely deep group. Partial pulpotomy was 90% successful (100% reversible, 78% irreversible or 100% mild, 88% moderate, 60% severe pulpitis) with a significant difference in outcome between mild and severe pulpitis groups (p = .04). Only one, severe pulpitis/irreversible pulpitis, case failed painfully prior to the 1-year review appointment. Bleeding time (p = .26) and TTP (p = .61) did not influence treatment outcome, whilst Biodentine™ setting time was significantly longer than manufacturers' claim (p < .05). No teeth discoloured.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Partial pulpotomy using Biodentine™ was successful for treating symptomatic carious pulpal exposures after 1 year, but included cases where pulp vitality could not be confirmed. Within the limitations of this study, cases with signs and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis were not less successful; however, Wolters classification highlighted severe pulpitis to be less successful than mild pulpitis, thereby providing a potential prognostic benefit in diagnostically subdividing pulpitis. Caries depth was an indicator of failure, whilst bleeding time and preoperative tenderness to percussion were not.