%0 Journal Article
%T Semi-supervised generative adversarial networks for closed-angle detection on anterior segment optical coherence tomography images: an empirical study with a small training dataset.
%A Zheng C
%A Koh V
%A Bian F
%A Li L
%A Xie X
%A Wang Z
%A Yang J
%A Chew PTK
%A Zhang M
%J Ann Transl Med
%V 9
%N 13
%D Jul 2021
%M 34422985
%F 3.616
%R 10.21037/atm-20-7436
%X <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Semi-supervised learning algorithms can leverage an unlabeled dataset when labeling is limited or expensive to obtain. In the current study, we developed and evaluated a semi-supervised generative adversarial networks (GANs) model that detects closed-angle on anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images using a small labeled dataset.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>In this cross-sectional study, a semi-supervised GANs model was developed for automatic closed-angle detection training on a small labeled and large unsupervised training dataset collected from the Joint Shantou International Eye Center of Shantou University and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (JSIEC). The closed-angle was defined as iris-trabecular contact beyond the scleral spur in AS-OCT images. We further developed two supervised deep learning (DL) models training on the same supervised dataset and the whole dataset separately. The semi-supervised GANs model and supervised DL models' performance were compared on two independent testing datasets from JSIEC (515 images) and the Department of Ophthalmology (84 images), National University Health System, respectively. The diagnostic performance was assessed by evaluation matrices, including the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>For closed-angle detection using clinician grading of AS-OCT imaging as the reference standard, the semi-supervised GANs model showed comparable performance, with AUCs of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00), compared with the supervised DL model (using the whole dataset) [AUCs of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00)]. When training on the same small supervised dataset, the semi-supervised GANs achieved performance at least as well as, if not better than, the supervised DL model [AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97)].<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>The semi-supervised GANs method achieves diagnostic performance at least as good as a supervised DL model when trained on small labeled datasets. Further development of semi-supervised learning methods could be useful within clinical and research settings.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>ChiCTR2000037892.