%0 Journal Article
%T Evidence on reporting guidelines for surgical technique in clinical disciplines: a scoping review protocol.
%A Zhang K
%A Ma Y
%A Shi Q
%A Shen J
%A Wu J
%A Zhang X
%A Jiao P
%A Li GS
%A Tang X
%A Petersen RH
%A Ng CSH
%A Fiorelli A
%A Novoa NM
%A Bedetti B
%A Levi Sandri GB
%A Hochwald S
%A Lerut T
%A Sihoe ADL
%A Barchi LC
%A Gilbert S
%A Waseda R
%A Toker A
%A Gonzalez-Rivas D
%A Fruscio R
%A Scarci M
%A Davoli F
%A Piessen G
%A Qiu B
%A Wang SD
%A Chen Y
%A Gao S
%J Gland Surg
%V 10
%N 7
%D Jul 2021
%M 34422603
%F 2.16
%R 10.21037/gs-21-311
%X <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>The reporting of surgical techniques is of mixed quality, with most at a very minimal level. Reporting guidelines that could be applied to guide surgical technique reporting vary in methodology for development, discipline coverage, dimension coverage and detail requested. However, a scoping review that could indicate the gaps and efforts needed in surgical technique reporting guidelines is lacking and warranted. This study aims to design a methodological rigour protocol to guide the development of a scoping review of surgical technique reporting guidelines.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>This protocol is designed following the 2020 manual proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute. To further ensure the soundness of the protocol, we also included multidisciplinary professionals (including methodologists, clinicians, and journal editors) to refine the protocol.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Seven key steps for developing the scoping review are identified and presented in detail, including (I) identifying the research questions; (II) inclusion criteria; (III) search strategy; (IV) source of evidence selection; (V) data extraction; (VI) analysis of the evidence; and (VII) presentation of the results. Guided by this protocol, the subsequent scoping review will inform us the overview of surgical technique reporting guidelines and precisely guide our direction and next steps in improving surgical technique reporting guidelines.<BR><B>UNASSIGNED: </B>This protocol is not registered as the PROSPERO database only accepts registration of systematic review protocols while does not accept registration of scoping review protocols.