%0 Journal Article %T OMERACT consensus-based operational definition of contextual factors in rheumatology clinical trials: A mixed methods study. %A Nielsen SM %A Boers M %A de Wit M %A Shea B %A van der Windt DA %A Reeves BC %A Beaton D %A Alten R %A Toupin April K %A Boonen A %A Escorpizo R %A Flurey C %A Furst DE %A Guillemin F %A Leong A %A Pohl C %A Rasmussen MU %A Singh JA %A Smolen JS %A Strand V %A Verstappen SMM %A Voshaar M %A Woodworth TG %A Ellingsen T %A March L %A Wells GA %A Tugwell P %A Christensen R %J Semin Arthritis Rheum %V 51 %N 3 %D 06 2021 %M 33875246 %F 5.431 %R 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.03.013 %X To develop an operational definition of contextual factors (CF) [1].
Based on previously conducted interviews, we presented three CF types in a Delphi survey; Effect Modifying -, Outcome Influencing - and Measurement Affecting CFs. Subsequently, a virtual Special Interest Group (SIG) session was held for in depth discussion of Effect Modifying CFs.
Of 161 Delphi participants, 129 (80%) completed both rounds. After two rounds, we reached consensus (≥70% agreeing) for all but two statements. The 45 SIG participants were broadly supportive.
Through consensus we developed an operational definition of CFs, which was well received by OMERACT members.