%0 Journal Article
%T Prehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients: a literature review.
%A Loewen I
%A Jeffery CC
%A Rieger J
%A Constantinescu G
%J J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
%V 50
%N 1
%D Jan 2021 6
%M 33407922
暂无%R 10.1186/s40463-020-00486-7
%X BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is one consequence of head and neck cancer that has a significant impact on quality of life for head and neck cancer survivors. While survival rates continue to improve, focus has shifted to maximizing long-term function, with prevention or prehabilitation programs becoming more common. Prehabilitation programs typically include an exercise regime that specifies the exercise type, the number of repetitions to complete per set, the number of sets of each exercise to complete per day, as well as the length of the treatment block. Ideally, exercise programs are designed with principles of neuromuscular plasticity in mind.
METHODS: Twenty-nine original research articles published between 2006 and 2020 were included in this state-of-the-art review and examined for program timing and details.
RESULTS: Two definitions for prehabilitation were noted: one third of the studies defined prehabilitation as preventative exercises prior to the start of acute cancer treatment; the remaining two thirds defined prehabilitation as treatment concurrent prehabilitation. Exercises prescribed ranged from general stretching and range of motion exercises, to trismus and swallowing specific exercises. The most common swallowing specific exercise was the Mendelsohn's maneuver, followed by the effortful swallow, Shaker, and Masako maneuver. The most common dose was 10 repetitions of an exercise, three times per day for the duration of radiation therapy. The most common measures were questionnaires, followed by g-tube dependence, mouth opening, and MBS reports.
CONCLUSIONS: This review of the literature has shed light on the variability of prehabilitation timing, exercise type, dose, duration of treatment, and outcomes associated with prehabilitation, making the selection of an optimal prehabilitation program difficult at this time.