%0 Comparative Study
%T Feeding an amino acid-formulated milk replacer for Holstein calves during 2 time periods.
%A Liu T
%A Hultquist K
%A Froehlich K
%A Casper DP
%J J Dairy Sci
%V 103
%N 11
%D Nov 2020
%M 32921466
%F 4.225
%R 10.3168/jds.2020-18529
%X The milk-fed calf has a requirement for essential amino acids (EAA) instead of crude protein (CP). However, most milk replacers (MR) are still formulated to a CP concentration, and although limited amounts of Lys or Met may be added, these MR are not formulated solely on an AA basis. Previous work has demonstrated that feeding a modified MR balanced for specific EAA concentrations of a 24% CP MR, but reducing CP to 22%, resulted in improved growth performance in calves compared with a 24% CP MR. The 56-d objective was to determine if the hypothesis that an EAA MR formulated to the specific EAA concentrations of a 24% CP MR, but reducing CP to 22 (22AA) compared with a standard 22% CP MR would result in similar or enhanced growth performance, while reducing feed costs. Two 56-d studies using forty 3- to 5-d-old Holstein bull calves per study received in 1 lot starting on May 8, 2018 (late-spring cooler) and June 22, 2018 (summer with heat stress) were blocked by body weight (BW) and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 MR treatments. Milk replacer treatments consisted of a standard 22:20 (CP:fat; 22CP) and a 22:20 MR with greater EAA concentrations of a 24% CP MR (22AA). All MR, containing decoquinate and diflubenzuron, were fed at 0.57 kg/d per calf split into 2 feedings at 0630 h and 1800 h for 0 to 14 d via bucket, increased to 0.85 kg/d through 35 d split in 2 feedings, and fed once per day at 0.41 kg/d in the morning with weaning after 42 d. Calves were housed in straw-bedded hutches with ad libitum access to water and 25% CP pelleted calf starter (CS). All data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with block within study considered random and week as a repeated measurement. Initial BW was similar across all treatments (39.9 ± 2.32 kg). Average daily temperature (i.e., heat stress intensity) tended to be greater for calves in study 2 compared with study 1 (20.5 and 22.9°C for study 1 and 2, respectively). The interaction of study and MR effects were nonsignificant. Calf BW, BW gain, average daily gain, CS intake, total dry matter intake (MR plus CS), feed conversions, and EAA intake (MR plus CS) were similar for calves fed both MR. Study 2 (summer heat stress) resulted in more scours incidences compared with study 1, and 22AA MR formulation tended to increase scours possibly due to synthetic AA addition or greater carbohydrate (lactose) inclusion when AA replaced protein sources. Feed costs as MR and total feed costs were lower for calves fed 22AA MR compared with calves fed 22CP MR. The increased Leu, Lys, Met, Thr, and Val concentrations in the 22AA MR compared with the 22CP MR resulted in similar calf growth performance, but the feed cost was lower for calves fed the 22AA MR, which achieved similar growth performance at a lesser cost under current study conditions, but not enhanced as hypothesized.